Ever feel like tech contracts are a game of hide-and-seek? Terms scattered across documents—or hidden on ever-changing websites—make it nearly impossible to know what you’re really agreeing to. It’s frustrating, and you’re not alone. In-house lawyers face this all the time. But what if we could shift this culture toward clarity, transparency, and fairness?
That’s exactly the conversation we dive into in the latest episode of Notes to My (Legal) Self, featuring Robin Meyer, General Counsel for TokenEx. Robin brings a wealth of experience to the table—first from the buyer’s side of tech contracting, and now as a legal leader in a tech-forward company. Her unique vantage point allows her to unpack the complexities of IT contracts with clarity and candor.
Watch the full conversation with Robin Meyer here:
The “Hiding the Ball” Phenomenon in Tech Contract Hidden Terms
Let’s be honest, tech contracts can be aggressive. They often include “gotcha” clauses that shift the risk onto the customer, even when the provider delivers the service. One common tactic is “hiding the ball,” where crucial clauses become tech contract hidden terms buried in obscure parts of the contract, making it difficult for the customer to understand their full implications.
For example, a tech provider might want to ensure they get paid no matter what. Instead of simply stating this in the payment clause, they might hide it in a termination clause, saying something like “upon termination, you will pay all accrued fees.” Sounds reasonable, right? But when you dig deeper, you might find that “accrued fees” means all fees that have accrued from day one of the contract, even if the service wasn’t fully utilized. This kind of sneaky language creates tech contract hidden terms that leave customers feeling misled and frustrated.
Scrutinizing Tech Contract Hidden Terms and Aligning with Operations
So how can in-house lawyers navigate this tricky landscape? The key is to be vigilant and to always scrutinize the contract thoroughly. Don’t just skim the surface; trace through defined terms, look for missing information, and really dig into the details of those tech contract hidden terms.
But it’s not just about reading between the lines. It’s also about understanding how the contract aligns with the provider’s operational reality. Talk to your team on the ground, understand how the service actually works, and ask yourself if the contract reflects that reality. If there’s a disconnect, it’s time to push back and negotiate for more fair terms.
Rethinking the Contractual Culture
Ultimately, the goal should be to shift the culture of tech contracts towards more transparency and fairness. This means pushing back against aggressive language, advocating for clear and concise terms, and ensuring that the contract reflects the true nature of the relationship between the provider and the customer—without tech contract hidden terms that could later create legal or financial risks.
This approach aligns with the growing trend of patient advocacy, where individuals affected by health issues voice their needs. Lawyers can learn from these advocates, realizing their role goes beyond enforcing the law—it’s about enabling positive change within the healthcare system. By fostering collaboration between legal teams and patient advocates, lawyers can bridge the gap between regulatory compliance and patient needs.
Watch the full conversation here: Notes to My (Legal) Self: Season 3, Episode 1(ft.Robin Meyer)
Join the Conversation
At Notes to My (Legal) Self®, we’re dedicated to helping in-house legal professionals develop the skills, insights, and strategies needed to thrive in today’s evolving legal landscape. From leadership development to legal operations optimization and emerging technology, we provide the tools to help you stay ahead.
What’s been your biggest breakthrough moment in your legal career? Let’s talk about it—share your story.
